Kevin J. Kalupson wrote:
> On 3/4/10 2:22 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> The current syntax is
>> non-obvious and perhaps problematic, but workable. Some other syntax
>> might be better, but let's not break the current syntax in the 1.1 branch.
> I don't think it's a syntax issue, I think it's a behavioral issue. I
> think the 1.1 branch exhibits broken behavior.
I'm pretty sure it was in 1.0 as well. It's a standard ZPT idiom.
Repoze-dev mailing list