Kevin J. Kalupson wrote:
> On 3/4/10 2:22 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
>  The current syntax is
>> non-obvious and perhaps problematic, but workable.  Some other syntax 
>> might be better, but let's not break the current syntax in the 1.1 branch.
> I don't think it's a syntax issue, I think it's a behavioral issue.  I
> think the 1.1 branch exhibits broken behavior.

I'm pretty sure it was in 1.0 as well.  It's a standard ZPT idiom.

Repoze-dev mailing list

Reply via email to