Malthe Borch wrote:
> On 4 March 2010 22:02, Kevin Kalupson <b...@bugs.repoze.org> wrote:
>> I wouldn't expect the the xml headers in a macro template to be applied to
>> page template being rendered. It makes no sense to me that an element not
>> contained within a macro definition would be applied to the page calling the
>> macro under any situation.
> I sort of agree, except how else would we provide this functionality?
> Or is it actually the case that it doesn't make sense for a macro to
> control these headers –– I suspect it is.
From a template developer's POV, it's useful to apply the same XML
declarations throughout a site using metal. The current syntax is
non-obvious and perhaps problematic, but workable. Some other syntax
might be better, but let's not break the current syntax in the 1.1 branch.
Repoze-dev mailing list