On 04/29/2010 10:39 AM, Chris Withers wrote: > Chris McDonough wrote: >>> As far as I know this is unnecessary. It's not in the repoze.cluegun >>> app, nor in the app I worked on at Jarn. Are there any problems when >>> you remove it? >> >> No idea. Withers, can you confirm? > > With the current setup, we end up doing both a .remove() in the > subscriber and then a .close() in the transaction. > > At worst, one of those two needs to be done. > > So, at worst, zope.sqlalchemy should be configurable as to whether > .close or .remove is called, but hopefully (pending confirmation from > Michael Bayer) just a .close should be fine and the code in the template > can just go away :-)
I need confirmation that removing it works, not that it should work. - C _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
