2010/4/29 Chris McDonough <chr...@plope.com>:
> On 04/29/2010 10:39 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
>> Chris McDonough wrote:
>>>> As far as I know this is unnecessary. It's not in the repoze.cluegun
>>>> app, nor in the app I worked on at Jarn. Are there any problems when
>>>> you remove it?
>>> No idea. Withers, can you confirm?
>> With the current setup, we end up doing both a .remove() in the
>> subscriber and then a .close() in the transaction.
>> At worst, one of those two needs to be done.
>> So, at worst, zope.sqlalchemy should be configurable as to whether
>> .close or .remove is called, but hopefully (pending confirmation from
>> Michael Bayer) just a .close should be fine and the code in the template
>> can just go away :-)
> I need confirmation that removing it works, not that it should work.

The application written by Jarn does not use it. I have other wsgi
applications which do not use it. Zope 2 has a similar transaction
usage, and nothing like that is ever needed for zope.sqlalchemy. It
shouldn't be in the template.

Repoze-dev mailing list

Reply via email to