Hi all, I am just going to blurt this out because I am thinking about it. At last night's Python Meetup Tres mentioned something about their being various ways to use BFG on GAE… which makes me wonder: what would it take to get GAE support from the "top down"?
I'm sure I already know the answer (well, I'll guess anyway): there is no immediate Agendaless (or any other big BFG shop) customer need for it, so it's not going to happen until there is. Fair enough (we all know/understand how that works). Which brings me to an actual question: is "marketing" BFG on GAE even desirable by the community? In other words, is making it work on a platform that has wide-spread adoption like GAE (I assume it has widespread adoption) something folks are interested in as a way to spread the word and inject new developers/users into the project? Or am I just blinded by shiny toys too much. I suspect the latter ;-) However I'll mention I see guys like philikon (http://i-luuv.appspot.com) and davisagli (http://buildthreat.appspot.com/) building "cool apps" on GAE and I can't help but wonder what it would be like if the BFG/GAE story was complete and in place. 2cents, Thanks for reading, Alex -- Alex Clark · http://aclark.net Author of Plone 3.3 Site Administration · http://aclark.net/plone-site-admin _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
