Am 29.09.2015 um 16:00 schrieb Miguel Landaeta: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:05:15PM +0000, Reproducible builds folks wrote: >> More information on >> https://reproducible.debian.net/testing/amd64/libibatis-java, feel free to >> reply to this email to get more help. > > Hi folks, > > Thank you very much for your helpful periodic email reports about > packages reproducibility. > > However, you should be more careful about false positive FTBFS reports > since in this case the failure came from lack of disk space in the > autobuilder.
I would like to take the opportunity to raise the following concern. I support the reproducible builds effort but I think the periodic e-mails to pkg-java are often not useful enough at the moment. There are far too many false-positives. The list should be reserved for discussing bug reports and due the flood of reproducible e-mails it happens that one can miss a bug report. The reports would be most useful if they included only confirmed FTBFS in testing. I know detecting FTBFS is only a by-product of the reproducible build effort but those bugs are the most interesting ones for us. All other issues are plainly visible thanks to DDPO and the corresponding QA pages like https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org There is even a column for CI/Rep. Thanks Markus
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproduciblefirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds