Am 29.09.2015 um 16:48 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Le 29/09/2015 16:32, Markus Koschany a écrit : [...] > I agree the false positive are annoying, but this is understandable > since the system is still in development (the recent addition of > disorderfs caused some troubles for example). Fortunately the > reproducible builds team is very reactive and the issues are solved > quickly. I expect the notifications to stabilize progressively.
I understand that everything is still in development. However I don't think a public mailing list is a suitable testbed. My preferred solution would be to make receiving such e-mails opt-in. Everyone who wants to get informed by e-mail may subscribe to this feature. I personally prefer and regularly check DDPO because it is quite, very informative and can be used on demand. The only other option I can think of is to filter pkg-java mails. >> The reports would be most useful if they included only confirmed FTBFS >> in testing. I know detecting FTBFS is only a by-product of the >> reproducible build effort but those bugs are the most interesting ones >> for us. > > Actually I tend to prefer the reports in unstable. The reports in > testing are often duplicates of issues already known in unstable, and > sometimes they are already fixed in unstable when they are notified in > testing. If we were to keep the reports for only suite I'd prefer the > unstable reports since it gives a faster feedback on our work. Ok. I could live with unstable as well as long as we agree on one distribution. Markus
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducibleemail@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds