On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:42:51AM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote: > Hi, > > Am Donnerstag, den 26.05.2016, 08:27 +0000 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo: > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 08:08:07AM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote: > > > > > > looking at the non-reproducibility of dcmtk [1], I found that for > > > some reason on i386 in one build cmake obtains "x86_64" as system > > > processor versus "i686" the in other build. > > That's because for i386 one build is done with a i386 kernel, and the > > other with a amd64 kernel, but both with a i386 userland. > I see. > > > > CMake supposedly uses "uname -p" to obtain this information and now > > > I'm wondering about the build environment of the first build? > > `uname -p` sounds like an ugly choice, also considering this: > > mattia@chase ~ % uname -p > > unknown > Yeah, I've seen the same in my setup, so I will report a bug for cmake > upstream. > > > > Unfortunately, the provided logs are only for amd64. > > Not sure what are you referring to here. > > For i386 there are both logs for build builds done on i386. > Okay, now I've found them, the interface is a bit irritating though, > because when opening the reproducible builds page amd64 is the default, > and it eluded me that when clicking on one of the i386 builds the > details in the pane above change. It would probably be better to have > the archs first listed and the according (changing) details below. > > Thanks, > Gert > > > _______________________________________________ > Reproducible-builds mailing list > Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
-- cheers, Holger
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds