> Craig (De Man!) wrote:
> > I'm told by Dantz that Retrospect itself knows of no second
> processor, and
> > is not written in such a way to take advantage of a second
> processor.
>
> I am currently on a press tour in Europe and happen to be
> sitting across from the
> Dantz CTO, Richard Zulch.
>
> Retrospect is carefully architected to be multi-threaded.
> Since Windows NT
> supports multiple processors symmetrically, threads will be
> allocated between the
> number of processors available.
>
> A two processor system will be faster than a single processor
> system. A four
> processor system will not give you the same increase in
> performance over a two
> processor system.
Does this mean that my multi-processor Mac clone (Daystar Genesis MP
2x200MHz) actually makes both processors available to Retrospect???
>
> Craig
> _____________________________
> Craig Isaacs
> Dantz Development Corporation
> www.betterbackup.com
>
Because e-mail can be altered electronically,
the integrity of this communication cannot be guaranteed.
--
----------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: <http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
