We did just that about a month ago. If you update your copies of
djblets and reviewboard, you'll notice that subsequent views for large
diffs are much, much better.


On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Mike Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been running review board for a few months now, and it's diff
> performance is lacking.  I can understand how it takes a while the
> first time, but it doesn't seem to be caching large diffs properly.
> I tried using memcached and whatnot, but it's too big for memcached
> (objects sizes are maxed at 1 mb for memcached and to change it, one
> needs to compile their own version with a hack).
> Here's the output from memcached:
> <25 set localhost:8060:diff-sidebyside-2552 1 2592000 1513712
>>25 SERVER_ERROR object too large for cache
> It takes a good 30 seconds to load each page of the diff (there are
> 5).  And each time they're reloaded it seems to be running the diff
> again.
> Perhaps I'm mistaken, but the diff's aren't cached on disk, right?
> Are there any plans on doing this in the future, or even need for it
> other than my own?  (I'd consider making a patch for this in my spare
> time if this would be useful to others than myself).
> Another solution would be just making <1mb chunks of files and storing
> that into memcached.
> Thanks,
> Mike Lewis
> >

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to