The critical issue is that pysvn does not yet support SVN 1.7, and generates
broken results. If someone can find a workaround we're happy to integrate
but otherwise I think we're going to wait for pysvn to update.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:19 PM, phoke <paul.w.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We upgraded to SVN 1.7 when it came out late last year. Unfortunately,
> we realized later that ReviewBoard does not have all of the proper
> support for SVN 1.7. There are several other people encountering
> similar issues/challenges with SVN 1.7 and ReviewBoard compatibility.
> The main issue is due to the fact that the diff output that SVN 1.7
> produces contains some new property entries in the diffi file that
> ReviewBoard or RB Tools does not seem to understand.
> Related thread:
> Is there any progress being made on SVN 1.7 compatibility support with
> ReviewBoard? This issue seems to have been around for several months
> now, but I have not seen any messages that indicate any progress or
> when a fix might be be available in a new RB release.
> Please let me know if you have any information on this topic.
> Thanks for your help!
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> For more options, visit this group at
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at