I believe there was an update to pysvn at the weekend - so it might be
worth checking that and seeing if that resolves the issues.
On Feb 14, 9:26 pm, David Trowbridge <trowb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The critical issue is that pysvn does not yet support SVN 1.7, and generates
> broken results. If someone can find a workaround we're happy to integrate
> but otherwise I think we're going to wait for pysvn to update.
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:19 PM, phoke <paul.w.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > We upgraded to SVN 1.7 when it came out late last year. Unfortunately,
> > we realized later that ReviewBoard does not have all of the proper
> > support for SVN 1.7. There are several other people encountering
> > similar issues/challenges with SVN 1.7 and ReviewBoard compatibility.
> > The main issue is due to the fact that the diff output that SVN 1.7
> > produces contains some new property entries in the diffi file that
> > ReviewBoard or RB Tools does not seem to understand.
> > Related thread:
> > Is there any progress being made on SVN 1.7 compatibility support with
> > ReviewBoard? This issue seems to have been around for several months
> > now, but I have not seen any messages that indicate any progress or
> > when a fix might be be available in a new RB release.
> > Please let me know if you have any information on this topic.
> > Thanks for your help!
> > Paul
> > --
> > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> > For more options, visit this group at
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at