If that's the case, it definitely sounds like a bug then. We can look into
it for a point release.
Given that you're probably the first company we've seen actually using
Local Sites, out side of our very custom setup for RBCommons, you may hit
more of these. Given that, you're sort of the guinea pig :) I'd say, file
bugs as you see them, and of course we wouldn't mind any patches if there's
anything you'd be able to fix, but otherwise we'll try to get things out in
patch releases when possible.
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Jake Friedman <cow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. I understood that Local Sites were not fully
> complete, but I had hoped to use them for my company's internal server due
> to security concerns with the code we are reviewing, as local sites provide
> more solid compartmentalization of users and reviews than private groups.
> As far as I can tell, the review request is properly setup in the
> database. The request, repo, and review group are all part of the same
> local site. Creating a new review on the same local site/group shows the
> same issue, as well as a new review on a new local site/group I created for
> I am therefore assuming this is a bug with the standard local site code,
> but I wanted to check here for suggestions before submitting a bug report.
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> For more options, visit this group at
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at