My hope at this point is that there was something wrong with the repository. We've used this combination of tools for a couple of years with no issue, even after a couple of server upgrades/reinstalls.
On Tuesday, June 17, 2014 12:12:47 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi Brian, > > So, I guess Bazaar requires a local timestamp when doing a 'date:’ query. > Review Board attempts to convert the date in the diff to a local date that > would match it. It sounds like something’s going terribly wrong there. I > toyed with it briefly, but couldn’t reproduce the problem you’re hitting. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com <javascript:> > Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org > Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com > > On June 17, 2014 at 12:07:13 PM, Brian (phxg...@gmail.com <javascript:>) > wrote: > > Hi Christian, > > So far I haven't found a pattern in the timestamps that are causing > issues. I have upgraded one of our servers to use RB 2.0.2 and I also > recreated the Bazaar repository that we were using. There are only two of > us working on this project and very little history, so we didn't really > lose anything. I'm hoping that our problem either goes away, or I will be > able to find something when I check a diff after each commit we do. > > I'll keep you up to date on what I can find out. > > Thanks for looking into this! > Brian > > On Tuesday, June 17, 2014 3:40:28 AM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: >> >> Hi Brian, >> >> Spent a little bit of time this evening trying to debug this, but no >> real luck. >> >> Can you see if there’s anything in common with the timestamps where >> things fail? Do they wrap around to a new day, new month, anything? >> >> Christian >> >> -- >> Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com >> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org >> Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com >> >> On June 12, 2014 at 3:44:13 PM, Brian (phxg...@gmail.com) wrote: >> >> I can tell you what we know so far. When we have this issue, I trace >> the "bad revision" back to what I can find in the Bazaar log for the file. >> We are UTC-7, and the timestamp is usually 7 hours off from a match. This >> may be the case for all files/revisions, I'm not sure yet. Most (if not >> all) of our development machines are set to UTC, but maybe there is one >> somewhere that is not and is affecting this. Typically we can edit the diff >> to match the time in the bzr log and Review Board handles the diff with no >> problem. >> >> In the last week, we have see an instance or two where this workaround >> has not been successful. >> >> Separate, but maybe related, we have also had a couple of instances where >> 1 of 24, or 2 of 6, or 4 of 4 diffs in a file did not apply cleanly. We're >> not sure what happened with that exactly, but the timestamps in the diff >> and log were off by 7 hours in those files too. >> >> I'm actually waiting for my IT person to make a copy of our server >> template right now so I can debug this. I'm planning on getting things set >> up to (hopefully) recreate the issue, then will try new versions of Review >> Board to see if that helps any. If not, I'll look into creating a clean >> Bazaar repository to see if that helps any. >> >> I'm also open to any other ideas you may have! >> >> Thanks, >> Brian >> >> On Thursday, June 12, 2014 3:26:31 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: >>> >>> Hi Brian, >>> >>> Can you go into more details on how the timestamps affect things? I’d >>> love to find a way to fix/workaround this in RBTools and/or Review Board. >>> >>> Christian >>> >>> -- >>> Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com >>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org >>> Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com >>> >>> On June 12, 2014 at 3:23:28 PM, Brian (phxg...@gmail.com) wrote: >>> >>> Hi Rahul, >>> >>> The way we have worked around it so far is to manually edit the diff. We >>> find the timestamp in the bzr log that it "should" be (UTC in our case), >>> then edit the diff to match. This had been ok for a while but it is not >>> working more and more often now. I'm actually about to start debugging it a >>> little more, I'm not entirely convince it's a Bazaar issue. >>> >>> I'll post more if I can figure out what is going on. >>> >>> Brian >>> >>> On Thursday, June 12, 2014 4:47:01 AM UTC-7, Rahul Sisondia wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Brian, >>>> >>>> I am also facing same issue. So what is the solution or workaround for >>>> this problem ? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Rahul >>>> >>>> On Thursday, April 17, 2014 2:28:29 AM UTC+5:30, Brian wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Following up on this... we found that the developer creating the diff >>>>> had a different time zone on his machine than the server. So it was >>>>> actually a Bazaar issue, not being able to match the times in the >>>>> checkouts. >>>>> >>>>> On Friday, February 28, 2014 12:46:16 PM UTC-7, Brian wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> We are using RB 1.7.12 and twice in the last two days we have gotten >>>>>> errors when uploading a diff of a Bazaar branch saying the requested >>>>>> revision does not exist: >>>>>> >>>>>> Requested revision: 'date:2014-02-11 22:54:13' does not exist in >>>>>> branch: <<path>> >>>>>> Requested revision: 'date:2014-02-11 23:00:10' does not exist in >>>>>> branch: <<path>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Removing the diff section that this part of the diff refers to allows >>>>>> the diff to be uploaded, but this is obviously a non-optimal solution. >>>>>> >>>>>> We have been using RB for a couple of years and have never seen this >>>>>> until the last couple of days. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any idea what might be happening? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Brian >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>> Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >>> --- >>> Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ >>> --- >>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "reviewboard" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >>> -- >> Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >> --- >> Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ >> --- >> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "reviewboard" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- > Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ > --- > Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ > --- > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "reviewboard" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
