Hi Eric,
Can you verify that rbintegrations was also packaged and that its extension
is enabled?
We really don't advise installing from our tarballs, as we build the eggs
and wheels with a particular setup to ensure they're packaged just right.
It is of course possible to build with tarballs, but there are differences.
The process of building eggs/wheels can result in changes to the required
dependencies and to some of the build steps. It'd be best if the "source"
could be the wheel, just extracted.
Christian
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 2:52 PM 'Eric Johnson' via Review Board Community <
reviewboard@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Mostly, I've managed to get quite far with packaging ReviewBoard for
> Linux. Although I don't know much about the Gentoo packaging system, it has
> turned out to be easier than I feared.
>
> We're currently running ReviewBoard 2.5.18, installed using the portage
> package manager. So we have done this packaging for 2.5.18. I tried this
> upgrade previously, but was stymied and gave up. This time I pushed ahead
> after understanding a better approach.
>
> I've gotten *almost* all the way to a successful 3.0.14 install of
> ReviewBoard. I've got it up and running, but one thing is going wrong, and
> I haven't figured out why, just yet. When I say I've got it up and running,
> that means that I've been able to perform rb-site upgrade on all the
> instances, login works, and I can browse the reviews. I can access the
> administrative pages (since I'm an admin). However, when I click on an
> individual review, I get an error:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>
> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/handlers/base.py",
> line 137, in get_response
> response = response.render()
> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/template/response.py",
> line 105, in render
> self.content = self.rendered_content
> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/template/response.py",
> line 82, in rendered_content
> content = template.render(context)
> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/template/base.py", line
> 140, in render
> return self._render(context)
> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/template/base.py", line
> 134, in _render
> return self.nodelist.render(context)
> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/template/base.py", line
> 840, in render
> bit = self.render_node(node, context)
> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/template/base.py", line
> 854, in render_node
> return node.render(context)
> File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/template/loader_tags.py", line
> 123, in render
> return compiled_parent._render(context)
> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/template/base.py", line
> 134, in _render
> return self.nodelist.render(context)
> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/template/base.py", line
> 840, in render
> bit = self.render_node(node, context)
> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/template/base.py", line
> 854, in render_node
> return node.render(context)
> File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/template/loader_tags.py", line
> 123, in render
> return compiled_parent._render(context)
> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/template/base.py", line
> 134, in _render
> return self.nodelist.render(context)
> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/template/base.py", line
> 840, in render
> bit = self.render_node(node, context)
> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/template/base.py", line
> 854, in render_node
> return node.render(context)
> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/template/base.py", line
> 1125, in render
> return func(*resolved_args, **resolved_kwargs)
> File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/djblets/extensions/templatetags/djblets_extensions.py",
> line 295, in load_extensions_css
> _render_css_bundle))
> File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/djblets/extensions/templatetags/djblets_extensions.py",
> line 265, in _get_extension_bundles
> yield renderer(context, extension, bundle_name)
> File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/djblets/extensions/templatetags/djblets_extensions.py",
> line 143, in _render_css_bundle
> name, 'CSS')
> File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/djblets/extensions/templatetags/djblets_extensions.py",
> line 117, in _render_bundle
> return node_cls('"%s"' % extension.get_bundle_id(name)).render(context)
> File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/templatetags/pipeline.py",
> line 140, in render
> return self.render_compressed(package, package_name, 'css')
> File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/djblets/extensions/templatetags/djblets_extensions.py",
> line 54, in render_compressed
> rendered = self.render_compressed_output(*args, **kwargs)
> File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/templatetags/pipeline.py",
> line 82, in render_compressed_output
> return method(package, package.output_filename)
> File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/templatetags/pipeline.py",
> line 147, in render_css
> 'url': mark_safe(staticfiles_storage.url(path))
> File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/storage.py",
> line 139, in url
> hashed_name = self.hashed_name(clean_name).replace('\\', '/')
> File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/storage.py",
> line 96, in hashed_name
> (clean_name, self))
>
> ValueError: The file
> 'ext/rbintegrations.extension.RBIntegrationsExtension/css/fields.min.css'
> could not be found with <pipeline.storage.PipelineCachedStorage object at
> 0x7f8e1b6c9ad0>.
>
> Note that this appears to be the same as:
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/reviewboard/FSzcHz-OaDg/89BXxRFDBAAJ
> ... but that thread in the mailing list didn't get a response.
>
> ---------------------
> I'm guessing I've done something to package this up incorrectly, but I'm
> not quite sure where to look next. Hence, the request for help. Several
> context notes:
>
> - I'm running using wsgi (v4.5.13) under Apache (v2.4.39)
> - Gentoo installs from *sources*, so I'm not using the .egg or .whl
> distributions, but the tar.gz.
> - I did have to patch here and there for the setup steps (more on that
> below)
> - Excluding differences in *.pyc files, the results of the Gentoo
> package installs of ReviewBoard and rbintegrations that I built are the
> same as the result of performing pip install --local -U ReviewBoard
>
> The last time I ran into a problem, I got stuck on the "setup" stage.
> Gentoo's infrastructure for installing Python packages involves calling the
> "setup.py" script. In the ReviewBoard and rbintegrations sources, the
> setup.py attempts to do a whole bunch of stuff that Gentoo doesn't allow in
> a package install step (installing node packages, in particular, as it
> breaks the sandbox for the package install). The solution ended up being
> very simple for the ReviewBoard package - in setup.py, change the
> "cmdclass=" line to "cmdclass_unused=", which disables all the extra steps
> in the install. For the rbintegrations package, I needed to go a little
> further, replacing the "from reviewboard.extensions.packaging import setup"
> with "from setuptools import setup", adding lines for "package_data" to
> ensure that the "setup.py install" step captures all of the relevant css,
> js, less, and png files, as well as installing a few images (which I copied
> from the results of the pip install).
>
> Although I don't believe it is relevant, there are a definitely python
> packages that are different between my "portage" based install vs. the
> "pip" install. Specifically, some of the python packages already exist in
> the Gentoo packaging system, so I didn't make new versions of those:
> asn1crypto-0.24.0.dist-info --> 0.22.0
> certifi-2019.3.9.dist-info --> 2018.4.16
> cffi-1.12.3.dist-info --> 1.11.4
> python_dateutil-2.8.0.dist-info --> 2.7.2
> django_evolution-0.7.8.dist-info --> 0.7.7
> dnspython-1.16.0.dist-info --> 1.15.0
> futures-3.2.0.dist-info --> 3.1.1
> idna-2.8.dist-info --> 2.5
> Markdown-2.6.11.dist-info --> 2.6.8
> PyNaCl-1.3.0.dist-info --> 1.2.1
> pillowfight-0.3-py2.7.egg-info --> 0.2
> pyasn1-0.4.5.dist-info --> 0.4.2
> pycparser-2.19-py2.7.egg-info --> 2.14
> Pygments-2.4.2.dist-info --> 2.3.1
> pytz-2019.1.dist-info --> 2018.9
> requests-2.22.0.dist-info --> 2.21.0
> urllib3-1.25.3.dist-info --> 1.24.2
>
> As I said, the resulting installed image in
> /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/reviewboard and
> /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/rbintegrations are *identical* to the
> ones installed via "pip install", with the exception of the *.pyc files.
>
> Any idea where I should look to fix this problem?
>
> In case it is relevant:
> # python --version
> Python 2.7.15
>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Review Board Community" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard/CANu9%3DNdWnyWiQYjcZrqRG89ZrtdzRaxkvS7UV9GH0O0J7ryy_Q%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard/CANu9%3DNdWnyWiQYjcZrqRG89ZrtdzRaxkvS7UV9GH0O0J7ryy_Q%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
Christian Hammond
President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/>
Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/>
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard/CAE7Vnd%3D5Qbh3p%2BsDCBWjQd-OXgV9pJWND9YRsLRk7e7LoTP7QQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
