-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/54933/#review159804
-----------------------------------------------------------




ambari-server/sbin/ambari-server (line 198)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/54933/#comment230854>

    Does setup-security perform any kerberos related tasks? If so I think 
setup-security and setup-kerberos should be merged into setup-security to avoid 
any confusion.


- Sebastian Toader


On Dec. 21, 2016, 1:58 p.m., Laszlo Puskas wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/54933/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 21, 2016, 1:58 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Attila Doroszlai, Robert Levas, and Sebastian 
> Toader.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-19266
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-19266
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> For Kerberos authentication a set of properties need to be set as ambari 
> properties (in the ambari.properties file)
> The patch adds support for these properties to be set from the command line 
> using the ambari-server command.
> 
> Usage:
> ambari-server setup-kerberos
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   ambari-server/sbin/ambari-server e0faf99 
>   ambari-server/src/main/python/ambari-server.py 64962d3 
>   ambari-server/src/main/python/ambari_server/kerberos_setup.py PRE-CREATION 
>   ambari-server/src/main/python/ambari_server/setupActions.py 7ea0752 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/54933/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Manually.
> Unit tests result (python tests only)
> 
> Total run:1147                                                                
>           
> Total errors:0                                                                
>           
> Total failures:0                                                              
>           
> OK
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Laszlo Puskas
> 
>

Reply via email to