-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/60481/#review179106
-----------------------------------------------------------




ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/checks/JavaVersionCheck.java
Lines 42 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/60481/#comment253590>

    Is this the minimum version for Ambari? Configuration defines this 
differently:
    
    
https://github.com/apache/ambari/blob/trunk/ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/configuration/Configuration.java#L180-L183
    
    Should we be using that instead?



ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/checks/JavaVersionCheck.java
Lines 57 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/60481/#comment253586>

    Probably not necessary...



ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/checks/JavaVersionCheck.java
Lines 64 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/60481/#comment253588>

    Is there an extra S on the end of this?


- Jonathan Hurley


On June 28, 2017, 9:34 a.m., Di Li wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/60481/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 28, 2017, 9:34 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Dmytro Grinenko, Dmitro Lisnichenko, Jonathan 
> Hurley, Sumit Mohanty, Sid Wagle, and Tim Thorpe.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-21359
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-21359
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This is for the JavaVersionCheck check defined in the cross stack upgrade 
> pack EU xml file.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/checks/CheckDescription.java
>  71c5857 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/checks/JavaVersionCheck.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60481/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> to be tested later on with the integrated tests.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Di Li
> 
>

Reply via email to