-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61833/#review183581
-----------------------------------------------------------




ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/state/configgroup/ConfigGroupImpl.java
Lines 118 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/61833/#comment259636>

    Can we pass in service name to the constructor and used that instead of 
tag? Similar to how this has  been done in AMBARI-21078 ?


- Sebastian Toader


On Aug. 23, 2017, 3:51 a.m., Sid Wagle wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/61833/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 23, 2017, 3:51 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Myroslav Papirkovskyy, Sumit Mohanty, and 
> Sebastian Toader.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-21784
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-21784
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Ambari server log is constantly populated with 'Config inconsistency exists: 
> unknown configType=solr-site' even after Solr deletion due to existence of 
> config group.
> 
> {code}
> 22 Aug 2017 19:00:20,094 ERROR [ambari-hearbeat-monitor] HostImpl:1085 - 
> Config inconsistency exists: unknown configType=solr-site
> {code}
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/state/cluster/ClusterImpl.java
>  3fb45ab 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/state/configgroup/ConfigGroupImpl.java
>  9058a63 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/state/host/HostImpl.java 
> 7282485 
>   ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/state/ServiceTest.java 
> 1ad8cef 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61833/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Manually verfied with a 2.5.2 cluster.
> Unit test added.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sid Wagle
> 
>

Reply via email to