----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38390/#review98977 -----------------------------------------------------------
docs/configuration-reference.md (line 332) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/38390/#comment155751> This could use a more objective statement about what the flag _is_ rather than that it intends to be. docs/configuration-reference.md (lines 344 - 355) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/38390/#comment155759> Tiers seems like a significant enough topic to warrant its own page with some more context and better flow. As it stands, it's really hard to understand what exactly a tier is and why i want or need to define them. Also, you might consider dropping the term 'best-effort' and stick to 'revocable' to avoid overloading the naming. docs/deploying-aurora-scheduler.md (line 201) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/38390/#comment155755> Would it make sense to remove this flag, and instead enable revocable resources when there's at least one configured tier that uses them? - Bill Farner On Sept. 14, 2015, 5:54 p.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/38390/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 14, 2015, 5:54 p.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora and Bill Farner. > > > Bugs: AURORA-1441 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1441 > > > Repository: aurora > > > Description > ------- > > Adding oversubscription summary. > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/configuration-reference.md ad2701cadd38bb2fdbbe2acc477038986f8ec733 > docs/deploying-aurora-scheduler.md 8db0e615b6abe6865a889dbcfb24271655caaee6 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38390/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Private remote: > https://github.com/maxim111333/incubator-aurora/blob/oversubscription_docs/docs/ > > > Thanks, > > Maxim Khutornenko > >
