> On Sept. 21, 2015, 9:48 p.m., Zameer Manji wrote: > > docs/configuration-reference.md, line 355 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/38390/diff/3/?file=1074726#file1074726line355> > > > > What happens if a job with a tier of revocable is sent to a scheduler > > where it isn't configured? I think that should be added here.
Added a clarification. - Maxim ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38390/#review99835 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Sept. 21, 2015, 9:41 p.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/38390/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 21, 2015, 9:41 p.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora, Bill Farner and Zameer Manji. > > > Bugs: AURORA-1441 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1441 > > > Repository: aurora > > > Description > ------- > > Adding oversubscription summary. > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/configuration-reference.md ad2701cadd38bb2fdbbe2acc477038986f8ec733 > docs/deploying-aurora-scheduler.md 8db0e615b6abe6865a889dbcfb24271655caaee6 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38390/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Private remote: > https://github.com/maxim111333/incubator-aurora/blob/oversubscription_docs/docs/ > > > Thanks, > > Maxim Khutornenko > >
