-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45298/#review128611
-----------------------------------------------------------



Pierre - do you want to continue with this RB and finisg up the doc fix?

- John Sirois


On March 24, 2016, 12:04 p.m., Pierre Cheynier wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/45298/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 24, 2016, 12:04 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora and John Sirois.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora-packaging
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> An operator should be able to build Aurora on his platform without
> relying on Docker.
> 
> Even if this is an interesting way of doing it, it sometimes introduce missed
> (build-)dependencies (in this case openssl) and context-specific behaviour
> (here, the way pants.ini was added to the build context)
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   README.md 3a7cf45034b7896c23588fed83176468ca627ebc 
>   builder/deb/debian-jessie/Dockerfile 
> 63e89deed9a411b1859ba28ea2572ef4a210da1f 
>   builder/deb/debian-jessie/pants.ini 
> 2ff2d5eb6128d4be3e15c0488d8d23bed81a8d5b 
>   builder/deb/ubuntu-trusty/Dockerfile 
> 52739100c9593292a7aea2459412c8e49f0155a4 
>   builder/deb/ubuntu-trusty/pants.ini  
>   builder/rpm/centos-7/Dockerfile a4d9dfcee5637d23333c31d0c2b63a9ebcf04e8d 
>   builder/rpm/centos-7/pants.ini  
>   specs/debian/control a30e987e4423c611c86518a8f5e3e68ee996982a 
>   specs/debian/rules 974fddfda6da04686daae691fa32c5b4c11a0b5d 
>   specs/rpm/aurora.spec 61e7d146108ae7dd5e129d8288a05773c2659d25 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45298/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Able to build on CentOS 6 using mock.
> Able to build on Debian. Limitation = need the patched version of Gradle.
> Still able to build using the current Docker build system
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Pierre Cheynier
> 
>

Reply via email to