> On March 5, 2014, 6:18 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> > Ping?  Kevin — waiting on a review from you.

Ping?


- Bill


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18487/#review36247
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 3, 2014, 6:29 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/18487/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 3, 2014, 6:29 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney and Maxim Khutornenko.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> There are a few nice things falling out of this refactor:
> - New methods on mutable store interfaces are not implicitly forwarded
>   (ForwardingStore does not implement mutable stores).
> - Write ahead/behind behavior is more obvious in LogStorage
>   (i found the delegation by calling super tough to catch mistakes.)
> - Callers with a handle on LogStorage don't have a means to invoke mutate 
> calls outside of a transaction
>   (they only get access to mutable stores in write(), which obviated 
> testMutateRequiresWriteOperation)
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/ForwardingStore.java 
> 34d39f2e9064b67ca226c13bb7e330f4daa2a2aa 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/TaskStore.java 
> 3d0ff2dfc01404c890dc17d23c3d15732915c438 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/log/LogStorage.java 
> 1842210c91ee3e153f5d142266bc2696960535af 
>   
> src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/log/WriteAheadStorage.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/log/LogStorageTest.java 
> d6624f470eadaf0be658db1d87d5863ea6701d94 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18487/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> ./gradlew build
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Farner
> 
>

Reply via email to