> On Oct. 17, 2014, 3:19 p.m., Jay Buffington wrote:
> > docs/storage.md, line 16
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/26845/diff/2/?file=723856#file723856line16>
> >
> >     I haven't really looked at the update features, yet.  Is this live and 
> > ready to go?  If not maybe defer referencing this until the updater work is 
> > shipped?

Yes, it's in beta and is available under "aurora beta-update" in the client.


> On Oct. 17, 2014, 3:19 p.m., Jay Buffington wrote:
> > docs/storage.md, line 18
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/26845/diff/2/?file=723856#file723856line18>
> >
> >     This is pretty much the complete list of what is stored in the 
> > replicated log, right?  s/For Example/Aurora stores the follow data/

Not, really. There are other stores handling job locks and scheduler internal 
data (i.e. framework ID) that are insignificant for explicit mentioning.


> On Oct. 17, 2014, 3:19 p.m., Jay Buffington wrote:
> > docs/storage.md, line 36
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/26845/diff/2/?file=723856#file723856line36>
> >
> >     Link to your doc that describes how to config and recover backups.  
> > When I read this I immediatly want to know how often the snapshots are 
> > taken and what negative impact there is from taking snapshots too 
> > frequently.

It was not available at the time of writing :), will make sure to add it.


> On Oct. 17, 2014, 3:19 p.m., Jay Buffington wrote:
> > docs/storage.md, line 11
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/26845/diff/2/?file=723856#file723856line11>
> >
> >     I'd like the see a paragraphic justifying avoiding the more traditional 
> > approaching of writing this data to a database like mysql or cassandra.  I 
> > think the justification is to remove deployment dependencies?

That and the high availability of a distributed storage. However, I'd avoid 
adding any comparative analysis here as we are currently re-evaluating our 
options ;)


> On Oct. 17, 2014, 3:19 p.m., Jay Buffington wrote:
> > docs/storage.md, line 40
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/26845/diff/2/?file=723856#file723856line40>
> >
> >     The ellipses serve no purpose. I'd remove them, but this is a minor 
> > knit.

Dropped.


- Maxim


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26845/#review57143
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 17, 2014, 12:21 a.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/26845/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 17, 2014, 12:21 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney and Bill Farner.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-839
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-839
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Created a high level storage architecture write up.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/images/storage_hierarchy.png PRE-CREATION 
>   docs/storage.md PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26845/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> https://github.com/maxim111333/incubator-aurora/blob/storage_doc/docs/storage.md
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Maxim Khutornenko
> 
>

Reply via email to