> On Feb. 18, 2015, 7:42 p.m., Kevin Sweeney wrote:
> > Hi Craig, thanks for the contribution. I'm wondering if this document might 
> > be better suited as a gist or blog post given that it's dated (0.7.1) and 
> > we don't have automated test coverage to ensure it doesn't diverge from the 
> > rest of the source tree. Alternatively if you'd like to provide a spec file 
> > and test coverage (e.g. docker run within our CI build) I think this would 
> > be much more palatable to commit. Also, while I personally love Digital 
> > Ocean I'm not sure what the rules on endorsing a specific vendor in 
> > official project documentation are.

I could post it as a blog post, where would a link to a blog post best go in 
the docs?


- Craig


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31042/#review72994
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 16, 2015, 7:21 p.m., Craig Wickesser wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31042/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 16, 2015, 7:21 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added document describing how to build Aurora for CentOS
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/build-for-centos.md PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31042/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Craig Wickesser
> 
>

Reply via email to