> On Feb. 18, 2015, 11:42 a.m., Kevin Sweeney wrote:
> > Hi Craig, thanks for the contribution. I'm wondering if this document might 
> > be better suited as a gist or blog post given that it's dated (0.7.1) and 
> > we don't have automated test coverage to ensure it doesn't diverge from the 
> > rest of the source tree. Alternatively if you'd like to provide a spec file 
> > and test coverage (e.g. docker run within our CI build) I think this would 
> > be much more palatable to commit. Also, while I personally love Digital 
> > Ocean I'm not sure what the rules on endorsing a specific vendor in 
> > official project documentation are.
> 
> Craig Wickesser wrote:
>     I could post it as a blog post, where would a link to a blog post best go 
> in the docs?
> 
> Bill Farner wrote:
>     I share Kevin's concern over bit rot here, simply because we have nothing 
> to exercise these.  However, i think Craig points out a big gap in figuring 
> out _what_ components are needed for a healthy Aurora cluster.  More 
> specifically, `README.md` has a link titled 'Deploying Aurora' that is 
> actually a guide for deploying the scheduler, and there is no equivalent for 
> other components.  (I've observed three people in IRC this week alone falling 
> into this trap.)
>     
>     Craig - how would you feel about pulling relevant content from this diff 
> into deploying-aurora-scheduler.md [1] (renaming to deploying-aurora.md)?
>     Kevin - does that sound reasonable?
>     
>     
>     [1] 
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-aurora/blob/master/docs/deploying-aurora-scheduler.md
> 
> Craig Wickesser wrote:
>     Bill, I think updating the existing "deploying" doc makes sense. If Kevin 
> agrees, I'll take that route.

+1


- Kevin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31042/#review72994
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 16, 2015, 11:21 a.m., Craig Wickesser wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31042/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 16, 2015, 11:21 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added document describing how to build Aurora for CentOS
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/build-for-centos.md PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31042/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Craig Wickesser
> 
>

Reply via email to