> On Feb. 18, 2015, 7:42 p.m., Kevin Sweeney wrote: > > Hi Craig, thanks for the contribution. I'm wondering if this document might > > be better suited as a gist or blog post given that it's dated (0.7.1) and > > we don't have automated test coverage to ensure it doesn't diverge from the > > rest of the source tree. Alternatively if you'd like to provide a spec file > > and test coverage (e.g. docker run within our CI build) I think this would > > be much more palatable to commit. Also, while I personally love Digital > > Ocean I'm not sure what the rules on endorsing a specific vendor in > > official project documentation are. > > Craig Wickesser wrote: > I could post it as a blog post, where would a link to a blog post best go > in the docs? > > Bill Farner wrote: > I share Kevin's concern over bit rot here, simply because we have nothing > to exercise these. However, i think Craig points out a big gap in figuring > out _what_ components are needed for a healthy Aurora cluster. More > specifically, `README.md` has a link titled 'Deploying Aurora' that is > actually a guide for deploying the scheduler, and there is no equivalent for > other components. (I've observed three people in IRC this week alone falling > into this trap.) > > Craig - how would you feel about pulling relevant content from this diff > into deploying-aurora-scheduler.md [1] (renaming to deploying-aurora.md)? > Kevin - does that sound reasonable? > > > [1] > https://github.com/apache/incubator-aurora/blob/master/docs/deploying-aurora-scheduler.md
Bill, I think updating the existing "deploying" doc makes sense. If Kevin agrees, I'll take that route. - Craig ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31042/#review72994 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Feb. 16, 2015, 7:21 p.m., Craig Wickesser wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/31042/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Feb. 16, 2015, 7:21 p.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora. > > > Repository: aurora > > > Description > ------- > > Added document describing how to build Aurora for CentOS > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/build-for-centos.md PRE-CREATION > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31042/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Craig Wickesser > >
