Dan Hecht has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/10394 )

Change subject: IMPALA-110 (part 2): Refactor PartitionedAggregationNode
......................................................................


Patch Set 2:

> I think that's probably unnecessary (hopefully this shouldn't be
 > too terrible to review, since the logic is entirely unchanged),

But it sounds like there is some changes in here that aren't purely code 
motion. i.e. some cleanups are in here too. so what i'm really wondering is how 
can we focus the review on those parts? Maybe you just want to add comments to 
indicate which code isn't a straight copy (and class rename)? Or some other way 
to highlight the more interesting parts?


-- 
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/10394
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I9e7bb583f54aa4add3738bde7f57cf3511ac567e
Gerrit-Change-Number: 10394
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: Thomas Marshall <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alex Behm <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Dan Hecht <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Marshall <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tim Armstrong <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Vuk Ercegovac <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:19:13 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No

Reply via email to