Joe McDonnell has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/19179 )

Change subject: IMPALA-11669: (addendum) Set TConfiguration in TMemoryBuffer
......................................................................


Patch Set 12:

> > Patch Set 12:
 > >
 > > > Patch Set 12:
 > > >
 > > > I wonder if somehow the flagsetter interacts:
 > > > https://github.com/apache/impala/blob/master/be/src/rpc/thrift-server-test.cc#L152
 > >
 > > Agree, that looks like the culprit. I thought the
 > ScopedFlagSetter suppose to restore the flag after it goes out of
 > scope?
 >
 > Tried couple stuff to limit FLAGS_thrift_rpc_max_message_size
 > change only for relevant tests, but no luck so far.
 > The other way that works for me is to enforce low 
 > FLAGS_thrift_rpc_max_message_size
 > for all test within thrift-server-test. All tests still pass even
 > with low FLAGS_thrift_rpc_max_message_size.

Yeah, and I think one option is to split off the tests that modify 
thrift_rpc_max_message_size into their own backend test. When I run the set of 
tests that don't touch thrift_rpc_max_message_size on their own, they pass. 
When I run the set of tests that use the lower thrift_rpc_max_message_size on 
their own, they pass.

I'm ok with using the lower message size for this test if everything works 
appropriately.


--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/19179
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I37a8e71c64a09ec8aeccb96c6ee59ca82c0b37cb
Gerrit-Change-Number: 19179
Gerrit-PatchSet: 12
Gerrit-Owner: Riza Suminto <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Csaba Ringhofer <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Impala Public Jenkins <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Joe McDonnell <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Quanlong Huang <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Riza Suminto <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Wenzhe Zhou <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2022 23:37:16 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No

Reply via email to