Michael Smith has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/19863 )

Change subject: IMPALA-11941: Support Java 17 in Impala
......................................................................


Patch Set 23:

> Patch Set 23:
>
> Do we want a way to fall back to ehcache sizeof? In other words, if we run 
> with jamm and we suspect there is an issue, we could restart with the option 
> to use the old ehcache implementation. This option is not useful for Java 17 
> and it would still need the add-opens. jamm would be the default.
>
> I'm trying to think about ways to test. Here are random thoughts:
> 1. Start catalog, load a few tables, compare the size measurements from jamm 
> to what we get with ehcache.
> 2. Start catalog, take a measurement, load a text table (e.g. 
> tpcds.store_sales), take a measurement, then load the parquet equivalent 
> (tpcds_parquet.store_sales), take another measurement. In theory, the size of 
> the metadata for the text table should be close to the same size as the 
> metadata for the parquet table?
> I don't know if those metrics are easily accessible.
>
> It's not clear what level of testing we need for the accuracy of jamm vs 
> ehcache. Then again, we didn't put ehcache through that level of scrutiny.

That's a reasonable fallback, and would make running some of those tests easier.


--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/19863
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic378896f572e030a3a019646a96a32a07866a737
Gerrit-Change-Number: 19863
Gerrit-PatchSet: 23
Gerrit-Owner: Michael Smith <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Impala Public Jenkins <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Joe McDonnell <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Laszlo Gaal <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Michael Smith <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Quanlong Huang <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 20:42:57 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No

Reply via email to