Michael Smith has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/20494 )

Change subject: IMPALA-12390 (part 4): Enable unnecessary-value-param
......................................................................


Patch Set 3:

(8 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/20494/2/be/src/codegen/codegen-anyval-read-write-info.cc
File be/src/codegen/codegen-anyval-read-write-info.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/20494/2/be/src/codegen/codegen-anyval-read-write-info.cc@145
PS2, Line 145: trin
> Couldn't we take it by const reference? Now LlvmCodeGen::CreateBinaryPhiNod
Oh yup, I think I looked at this file before CreateBinaryPhiNode. Makes sense 
for these to be const&.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/20494/2/be/src/codegen/codegen-anyval-read-write-info.cc@150
PS2, Line 150: trin
> Couldn't we take it by const ref if we can do it for CodegenNullPhiNode()?
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/20494/2/be/src/rpc/TAcceptQueueServer.cpp
File be/src/rpc/TAcceptQueueServer.cpp:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/20494/2/be/src/rpc/TAcceptQueueServer.cpp@210
PS2, Line 210:     const shared_ptr<TTransport>& io_transport, const 
shared_ptr<TTransport>& client) {
> Is there a reason why we don't take 'io_transport' and 'client' as raw poin
Private helper method that's simpler to call with shared_ptr. Not really a 
consistent reason.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/20494/2/be/src/rpc/authentication.cc
File be/src/rpc/authentication.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/20494/2/be/src/rpc/authentication.cc@627
PS2, Line 627: string
> Is it OK if we modify this string? GetUsernameFromBasicAuthHeader() calls T
You're right, better to be safe here. I'll have to figure out another way to 
appease clang-tidy.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/20494/2/be/src/rpc/authentication.cc@641
PS2, Line 641:
> See L627.
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/20494/2/be/src/rpc/thrift-thread.cc
File be/src/rpc/thrift-thread.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/20494/2/be/src/rpc/thrift-thread.cc@70
PS2, Line 70:   // Passing runnable in to this method (rather than reading from 
this->runnable())
> This comment indicates that taking by (const) reference may not be correct
Based on the Notes at 
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/functional/bind, I think the 
std::bind call above saves a copy of the shared_ptr, thereby reference counting 
it. So I think this comment is incorrect. However I'm comfortable adding a 
clang-tidy exception if that doesn't seem clear.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/20494/2/be/src/runtime/io/disk-io-mgr-test.cc
File be/src/runtime/io/disk-io-mgr-test.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/20494/2/be/src/runtime/io/disk-io-mgr-test.cc@720
PS2, Line 720: sub_ranges
> InitRange() takes 'sub_ranges' by value and moves it into ScanRange::Reset(
sub_ranges is called in a loop, we need to make a copy each call.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/20494/2/be/src/runtime/io/disk-io-mgr-test.cc@1085
PS2, Line 1085: sub_ranges
> See L720, although here we also use 'sub_ranges' on L1097. I'm not sure whe
We make multiple copies of sub_ranges in this function: here, and in a loop at 
L1094.



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/20494
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I8aa5d98596d82f615a0a728e0235e7dd9d8b5003
Gerrit-Change-Number: 20494
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: Michael Smith <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Anonymous Coward <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Becker <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Impala Public Jenkins <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Joe McDonnell <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Michael Smith <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 18:19:41 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to