CritasWang commented on PR #114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb-extras/pull/114#issuecomment-5055083611

   Both points look good to me.
   
   The `verifyQuery` fix is correct: requiring the database means every 
table-model query always runs `USE <database>` on its checked-out session, so 
there is no path by which a session's leftover state from a previous query can 
influence a result — regardless of pool scheduling or how many panels share the 
datasource. The comment in the code explains the reasoning clearly.
   
   The smoke-test caveat (backend path only, not through a rendered Grafana 
panel) is acceptable given the agreed toolchain situation. The scenarios you 
covered — multi-database pool sharing, all-types round-trip including INT64 
above 2^53, ISO-8601 macro expansion on a live server, error surfacing — are 
exactly what matters for this PR. The in-Grafana screenshot can follow with the 
toolchain-migration PR as discussed.
   
   LGTM from my side. Waiting for CI on the latest commit to go green, then 
this is ready to merge.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to