Adar Dembo has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/14263 )

Change subject: KUDU-2842: don't reference CowLock state from TSInfosDict
......................................................................


Patch Set 4:

(3 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/14263/4/src/kudu/integration-tests/ts_tablet_manager-itest.cc
File src/kudu/integration-tests/ts_tablet_manager-itest.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/14263/4/src/kudu/integration-tests/ts_tablet_manager-itest.cc@278
PS4, Line 278: enum WithConcurrentGetTableLocations {
             :   YES,
             :   NO,
             : };
Why not just have the test unconditionally hammer the master? What's the 
purpose of having a variant with the extra thread and a variant without?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/14263/4/src/kudu/integration-tests/ts_tablet_manager-itest.cc@351
PS4, Line 351:         WARN_NOT_OK(master_proxy->GetTableLocations(req, &resp, 
&rpc), "Failed to send request");
Could just ignore_result() here then. Do we actually want those warnings in the 
test log?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/14263/4/src/kudu/master/catalog_manager.cc
File src/kudu/master/catalog_manager.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/14263/4/src/kudu/master/catalog_manager.cc@4848
PS4, Line 4848:           [&]() -> std::pair<StringPiece, int> {
Why did you have to remove const here, and use a temporary StringPiece on L4853?



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/14263
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I30f4cd2eb8439e1923c1c2617248514354561d16
Gerrit-Change-Number: 14263
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: Andrew Wong <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Adar Dembo <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexey Serbin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Andrew Wong <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins (120)
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tidy Bot (241)
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 04:09:43 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to