Andrew Wong has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/16510 )

Change subject: KUDU-2612: have MRS iteration account for txn metadata
......................................................................


Patch Set 6:

(5 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16510/6//COMMIT_MSG
Commit Message:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16510/6//COMMIT_MSG@12
PS6, Line 12: TxnMetadata in the MRS
> Wondering is TxnMetadata and MRS  is  a 1 to 1 mapping? It seems so, by rea
Right, there will be 1 MRS per transaction. This will make it easier to commit 
and abort transactions -- instead of updating several rows of a transaction, 
commit/abort will be metadata operations (e.g. mark the transaction's MRS as 
committed, or delete the MRS if the transaction was aborted).


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16510/6//COMMIT_MSG@14
PS6, Line 14: relevancy
> Is relevancy is in terms of scan?
I'm not sure what this is asking, but relevancy is a term used in scanning that 
indicates whether a given mutation is relevant in a scan.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16510/6/src/kudu/tablet/mvcc-test.cc
File src/kudu/tablet/mvcc-test.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16510/6/src/kudu/tablet/mvcc-test.cc@830
PS6, Line 830: MvccSnapshot initial_snap(initial_ts)
> IIUC, the initial snapshot type is kLatest, sorry I miss where in the test
I think you might be conflating this with the 'cur_snap_' member in 
MvccManager. 'cur_snap_' is a kLatest snapshot. This test is not testing 
'cur_snap_' -- it is testing kTimestamp snapshots.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16510/6/src/kudu/tablet/mvcc.h
File src/kudu/tablet/mvcc.h:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16510/6/src/kudu/tablet/mvcc.h@101
PS6, Line 101: If the commit MVCC op finished applying, the commit process is
             :       // complete,
> Sorry, but I miss the part how do we make sure the mvcc op is not applied u
Here's a summary of the commit process: 
https://gerrit.cloudera.org/c/16470/12/src/kudu/consensus/time_manager.h#88
And here's where the MVCC op is completed, only upon performing the 
FINALIZE_COMMIT or ABORT_TXN: 
https://gerrit.cloudera.org/c/16470/12/src/kudu/tablet/ops/participant_op.cc#181


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16510/6/src/kudu/tablet/txn_metadata.h
File src/kudu/tablet/txn_metadata.h:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16510/6/src/kudu/tablet/txn_metadata.h@89
PS6, Line 89: commit_mvcc_op_timestamp_
> If I understand correctly, this is BEGIN_COMMIT mvcc op? If so, do you thin
Kind of -- it is initialized in the BEGIN_COMMIT op, but it is more broadly 
used as a part of the commit process, described here: 
https://gerrit.cloudera.org/c/16470/12/src/kudu/consensus/time_manager.h#88



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/16510
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I6bb02c6025eea1a327cf9d9ee1f14a38d63ae4ad
Gerrit-Change-Number: 16510
Gerrit-PatchSet: 6
Gerrit-Owner: Andrew Wong <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexey Serbin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Andrew Wong <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Grant Henke <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Hao Hao <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins (120)
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tidy Bot (241)
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 20:42:52 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to