Andrew Wong has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/16699 )

Change subject: KUDU-2612: fuzz transactional inserts
......................................................................


Patch Set 4:

(11 comments)

Test failures are unrelated.

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16699/3/src/kudu/integration-tests/fuzz-itest.cc
File src/kudu/integration-tests/fuzz-itest.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16699/3/src/kudu/integration-tests/fuzz-itest.cc@189
PS3, Line 189:
> nit: maybe, introduce a constant for this, like kNoTxnId ?
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16699/3/src/kudu/integration-tests/fuzz-itest.cc@441
PS3, Line 441: ey;
> nit: why to change this? :) (just curious)
I just found it easier to read since I'm better versed at math operations than 
bit operations (and assume most are). They should compile to the same 
instructions though https://godbolt.org/z/jGvYxd


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16699/3/src/kudu/integration-tests/fuzz-itest.cc@786
PS3, Line 786:
> What is 'valid' criteria here?  Could you add more colors here?
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16699/3/src/kudu/integration-tests/fuzz-itest.cc@868
PS3, Line 868:
> Is it acceptable to have txn_id == -1 here?  If not, add a CHECK here?
It is acceptable, e.g. if we have chosen to insert not as a part of a 
transaction.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16699/3/src/kudu/integration-tests/fuzz-itest.cc@925
PS3, Line 925: ouchin
> does not exist ?
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16699/3/src/kudu/integration-tests/fuzz-itest.cc@950
PS3, Line 950: The ro
> nit: does not exist?
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16699/3/src/kudu/integration-tests/fuzz-itest.cc@1137
PS3, Line 1137:
> nit: would {} suffice here?
Interestingly enough, no:

../../src/kudu/gutil/map-util.h:467:6: note: candidate template ignored: 
substitution failure [with Collection = std::__1::unordered_map<int, 
std::__1::vector<int, std::__1::allocator<int> >, std::__1::hash<int>, 
std::__1::equal_to<int>, std::__1::allocator<std::__1::pair<const int, 
std::__1::vector<int, std::__1::allocator<int> > > > >]: deduced incomplete 
pack <const int &, (no value)> for template parameter 'Args'


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16699/3/src/kudu/integration-tests/fuzz-itest.cc@1139
PS3, Line 1139:       case TEST_INSERT:
> nit: could you add a comment reminding that currently only INSERT can be tr
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16699/3/src/kudu/integration-tests/fuzz-itest.cc@1142
PS3, Line 1142: LLTHROUGH_INTENDE
> Should there be a check like at line 1107 before assigning setting the exis
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16699/3/src/kudu/integration-tests/fuzz-itest.cc@1203
PS3, Line 1203:  ops that are current pending
> nit: might this be 'auto' ?
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16699/3/src/kudu/integration-tests/fuzz-itest.cc@1695
PS3, Line 1695: }
> nit: remove this extra empty row?
Done



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/16699
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I719d42327ab18fda874332c9d6e1ae34aca8e846
Gerrit-Change-Number: 16699
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: Andrew Wong <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexey Serbin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Andrew Wong <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Grant Henke <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Hao Hao <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins (120)
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tidy Bot (241)
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 06:58:44 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to