Grant Henke has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/16969 )

Change subject: [java] address warnings from the SonarLint tool
......................................................................


Patch Set 1:

(3 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16969/1/java/kudu-client/src/main/java/org/apache/kudu/ColumnTypeAttributes.java
File java/kudu-client/src/main/java/org/apache/kudu/ColumnTypeAttributes.java:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16969/1/java/kudu-client/src/main/java/org/apache/kudu/ColumnTypeAttributes.java@118
PS1, Line 118:     return length == that.length;
I am not sure I prefer this syntax to the existing syntax. Do you think it's 
better? If so why?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16969/1/java/kudu-client/src/main/java/org/apache/kudu/client/RowResultIterator.java
File 
java/kudu-client/src/main/java/org/apache/kudu/client/RowResultIterator.java:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16969/1/java/kudu-client/src/main/java/org/apache/kudu/client/RowResultIterator.java@51
PS1, Line 51:                             int numRows) {
I think reuseRowResult was kept around for compatibility concerns. It would be 
good to go back and validate.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16969/1/java/kudu-client/src/main/java/org/apache/kudu/util/AsyncUtil.java
File java/kudu-client/src/main/java/org/apache/kudu/util/AsyncUtil.java:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16969/1/java/kudu-client/src/main/java/org/apache/kudu/util/AsyncUtil.java@75
PS1, Line 75:   private AsyncUtil() {
Should this go at the top of the class? Here and elsewhere.



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/16969
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I306575b370fb69a54fdc24b9d770a99291828ef7
Gerrit-Change-Number: 16969
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Alexey Serbin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexey Serbin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Grant Henke <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:35:45 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to