Attila Bukor has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/18159 )

Change subject: [java] Upgrade dependencies
......................................................................


Patch Set 10:

(2 comments)

> Patch Set 7:
>
> (2 comments)
>
> It seems Java LINT isn't yet happy, complaining about 
> META-INF/services/reactor.blockhound.integration.BlockHoundIntegration: 
> http://jenkins.kudu.apache.org/job/kudu-gerrit/24974/BUILD_TYPE=LINT/console

I couldn't figure out what changed, it's coming from Netty, but this file has 
been there for ages.

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/18159/7//COMMIT_MSG
Commit Message:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/18159/7//COMMIT_MSG@42
PS7, Line 42: 30.1.-jre -> 31.0.1-jre
> This looks rather like a downgrade :)  BTW, I didn't find guava version cha
It's 30 -> 31. Guava is here: 
https://gerrit.cloudera.org/c/18159/7/java/buildSrc/build.gradle#41


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/18159/7/java/kudu-backup/src/main/scala/org/apache/kudu/backup/KuduBackup.scala
File java/kudu-backup/src/main/scala/org/apache/kudu/backup/KuduBackup.scala:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/18159/7/java/kudu-backup/src/main/scala/org/apache/kudu/backup/KuduBackup.scala@142
PS7, Line 142:     val parallelTables = options.tables.par
> Since no clean-up is needed per https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/18159/6/jav
Done



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/18159
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I300af97556a8c12a2e7c0deb2ae723c2ea639518
Gerrit-Change-Number: 18159
Gerrit-PatchSet: 10
Gerrit-Owner: Attila Bukor <abu...@apache.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexey Serbin <aser...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Andrew Wong <aw...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Attila Bukor <abu...@apache.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins (120)
Gerrit-Reviewer: Zoltan Chovan <zcho...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 16:09:05 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to