Yuqi Du has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/19522 )

Change subject: [test] Improve the LBM startup benchmark
......................................................................


Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1

(2 comments)

LGTM.

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/19522/1/src/kudu/fs/log_block_manager-test.cc
File src/kudu/fs/log_block_manager-test.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/19522/1/src/kudu/fs/log_block_manager-test.cc@104
PS1, Line 104: DEFINE_double
The type is changed from int32 to double, is there some reason?
The validator about double below
' { return 0 <= v && v <= 100; }' ,  seems a little uneasy.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/19522/1/src/kudu/fs/log_block_manager-test.cc@1118
PS1, Line 1118:       for (; j < block_ids.size(); j++) {
              :         deletion_transaction->AddDeletedBlock(block_ids[j]);
              :         if (--to_delete_count_per_batch <= 0) {
              :           break;
              :         }
              :       }
to_delete_count <= block_ids.size();     (L1106)

startup_benchmark_data_dir_count_for_testing should be >=1 (semantics 
requirement)

so    to_delete_count_per_batch <= block_ids.size().

It seems ok below:

      for (; j < to_delete_count_per_batch; j++) {
        deletion_transaction->AddDeletedBlock(block_ids[j]);
      }



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/19522
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I148c6eebf29a18d680f5372a8f2c4b1f31882371
Gerrit-Change-Number: 19522
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Yingchun Lai <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexey Serbin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: KeDeng <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins (120)
Gerrit-Reviewer: Wang Xixu <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Yingchun Lai <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Yuqi Du <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 07:35:38 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to