> On May 19, 2015, 12:42 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote: > > My high leve comment: > > > > Lets add the following check/invariant in the master: > > > > "An executor and all its tasks should all use regular resources or should > > all use revocable resources". > > > > We can relax this policy in the future when we have better QoS mechanisms > > in place. Does that make sense?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2753 - Ian ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34310/#review84371 ----------------------------------------------------------- On May 19, 2015, 3:43 p.m., Ian Downes wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/34310/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated May 19, 2015, 3:43 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Joris Van Remoortere, Niklas Nielsen, and Vinod > Kone. > > > Bugs: MESOS-2652 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2652 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Use IDLE scheduling for revocable CPU in cgroups isolator. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/slave/containerizer/isolators/cgroups/cpushare.hpp > ff4a9dbdb1b655e71bf87dcee8fe62433d396f52 > src/slave/containerizer/isolators/cgroups/cpushare.cpp > 6a5b2b5c6e2844fe1a10815956569194b6f56681 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34310/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Ian Downes > >
