> On May 19, 2015, 12:42 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > My high leve comment:
> > 
> > Lets add the following check/invariant in the master:
> > 
> > "An executor and all its tasks should all use regular resources or should 
> > all use revocable resources". 
> > 
> > We can relax this policy in the future when we have better QoS mechanisms 
> > in place. Does that make sense?

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2753


- Ian


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34310/#review84371
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 19, 2015, 3:43 p.m., Ian Downes wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/34310/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 19, 2015, 3:43 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Joris Van Remoortere, Niklas Nielsen, and Vinod 
> Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2652
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2652
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Use IDLE scheduling for revocable CPU in cgroups isolator.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/isolators/cgroups/cpushare.hpp 
> ff4a9dbdb1b655e71bf87dcee8fe62433d396f52 
>   src/slave/containerizer/isolators/cgroups/cpushare.cpp 
> 6a5b2b5c6e2844fe1a10815956569194b6f56681 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34310/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ian Downes
> 
>

Reply via email to