-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34703/#review87550
-----------------------------------------------------------



3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/time.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/34703/#comment139934>

    `s/constexpr/static/`



3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/time.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/34703/#comment139936>

    Formatting:
    
    ```static const char* WEEK_DAYS[] = {
           "Sun", "Mon", "Tue", "Wed", "Thu", "Fri", "Sat
       };
    ```



3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/time.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/34703/#comment139935>

    `s/constexpr/static/`



3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/time.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/34703/#comment139937>

    Formatting:
    
    ```
    static const char* MONTHS[] = {
        "Jan",
        "Feb",
        "Mar",
        "Apr",
        "May",
        "Jun",
        "Jul",
        "Aug",
        "Sep",
        "Oct",
        "Nov",
        "Dec"
    };
    ```


- Michael Park


On June 8, 2015, 3:14 p.m., Alexander Rojas wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/34703/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 8, 2015, 3:14 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Bernd Mathiske, Michael Park, Nikita Vetoshkin, and 
> Till Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Bugs: mesos-708
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/mesos-708
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Adds some manipulator classes which allows formatting Time objects to 
> ostreams.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/time.hpp 
> c5ab2a3cfa83590eb6612152ae365dd67f51cea9 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/time_tests.cpp 
> be314182c65c05d439b81aa5248a71d93f6f0a0b 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34703/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rojas
> 
>

Reply via email to