> On June 8, 2015, 2:59 p.m., Till Toenshoff wrote: > > 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/time.hpp, line 150 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/34703/diff/3/?file=974298#file974298line150> > > > > Lets think about a good replacement for that class name to make it > > intuitive - first thing that came to mind is ```UnixTimestamp```. > > > > Lets also add an example right here in this comment.
Apparently BenH is OK with leaving the RFC as part of the name. - Alexander ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34703/#review87013 ----------------------------------------------------------- On June 8, 2015, 5:14 p.m., Alexander Rojas wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/34703/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated June 8, 2015, 5:14 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Bernd Mathiske, Michael Park, Nikita Vetoshkin, and > Till Toenshoff. > > > Bugs: mesos-708 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/mesos-708 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Adds some manipulator classes which allows formatting Time objects to > ostreams. > > > Diffs > ----- > > 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/time.hpp > c5ab2a3cfa83590eb6612152ae365dd67f51cea9 > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/time_tests.cpp > be314182c65c05d439b81aa5248a71d93f6f0a0b > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34703/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Alexander Rojas > >
