-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35919/#review89854
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Minor points, but otherwise shippable.
I guess I'm still a little confused by the motivation. When would the firewall 
filter rule have more information about how to respond than the caller would? 
Can you give an example?


3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/firewall.hpp (line 57)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/35919/#comment142703>

    s/and/an/
    s/option/Option/
    Maybe worth clarifying that you do not return "200 OK" for rules that apply 
cleanly.



3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/firewall.hpp (line 59)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/35919/#comment142707>

    So if the caller wants to override the Response, they should check for a 
specific response type, extract the error message, and then handle it 
appropriately?



3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/firewall.hpp (line 86)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/35919/#comment142711>

    How about `Forbidden("Endpoint '" + request.path + "' is disabled")` so you 
don't start the message with a path.



3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp (lines 2019 - 2020)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/35919/#comment142712>

    You're not logging the Response body anymore?


- Adam B


On June 29, 2015, 3:21 a.m., Alexander Rojas wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/35919/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 29, 2015, 3:21 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B and Till Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2877
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2877
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> see summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/firewall.hpp 
> f71d6541e48e2481c69f401b388977b153503962 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp 
> 52649fb90cdbefb495b68d0beb8c7f7e5ef6888e 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35919/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rojas
> 
>

Reply via email to