> On Aug. 14, 2015, 12:12 p.m., James DeFelice wrote: > > failing unit test from mesos built bot seems completely unrelated (evil > > agent!): > > ``` > > ../../../3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/http_tests.cpp:461: Failure > > Value of: response.get().status > > Actual: "202 Accepted" > > Expected: http::statuses[200] > > Which is: "200 OK" > > [ FAILED ] HTTPTest.NestedGet (2 ms) > > ```
i wrote that test. looking... - Vinod ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37443/#review95417 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Aug. 14, 2015, 11:58 a.m., James DeFelice wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/37443/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 14, 2015, 11:58 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Adam B, Connor Doyle, and Niklas Nielsen. > > > Bugs: MESOS-2841 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2841 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > This is intended to support frameworks that want to offer capabilities to the > rest of the cluster (e.g., storage or some arbitrary third-party service). We > want processes running in the cluster to be able to discover these > capabilities; > however, we don't want to commit to a fixed set of capabilities or how those > capabilities should be represented. Hence, this commit represents this > information using freeform key-value pairs, similar to the labels mechanism > already in use elsewhere. > > Jira: MESOS-2841 > > supercedes #36867 ; addressed outstanding review comments in that review > > > Diffs > ----- > > include/mesos/mesos.proto a4a9c6f > src/master/http.cpp 579c009 > src/master/master.hpp 4e29470 > src/tests/fault_tolerance_tests.cpp c63599a > src/tests/master_tests.cpp a4703af > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37443/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > James DeFelice > >
