----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38168/#review99224 -----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it! Last minor nit: we tend to use past tense in summary and prepend the commit message with "libprocess" for libprocess changes. Also, not a trailing period. That's how it may be rewritten: "libprocess: Replaced hard-coded reap interval with a constant." Description is in present, but you don't need any in this case. Last, but not least: though not that many people adhere to this style, it's sometimes benefitial to mention on what platforms did you run `make check` or `make distcheck`. Shouldn't make a difference for this patch though. - Alexander Rukletsov On Sept. 9, 2015, 2:59 p.m., Guangya Liu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/38168/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 9, 2015, 2:59 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov and Ben Mahler. > > > Bugs: MESOS-1935 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1935 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Replace hard-coded reap interval with a constant for 3rdparty > > > Diffs > ----- > > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/reap_tests.cpp > 642ab97b28a6085dc9837f14ff36a3124387a03b > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/subprocess_tests.cpp > ab7515325e5db0a4fd222bb982f51243d7b7e39d > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38168/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make distcheck > > > Thanks, > > Guangya Liu > >
