> On Sept. 18, 2015, 5:52 p.m., Artem Harutyunyan wrote:
> > docs/maintenance.md, line 27
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/37585/diff/11/?file=1076950#file1076950line27>
> >
> >     Did the notion of an operator not exist before Maintenance Primitives 
> > were introduced? I would rephrase the sentence above to say that we're 
> > definining terms for the puropse of this doc.

Moved to the top of the section.


> On Sept. 18, 2015, 5:52 p.m., Artem Harutyunyan wrote:
> > docs/maintenance.md, lines 91-92
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/37585/diff/11/?file=1076950#file1076950line91>
> >
> >     Can they also specify seconds? If not, we should definitely add a JIRA 
> > for that (as a syntactic sugar for the interface). Please mention somewhere 
> > that start is the nanoseconds since epoch.

Added a note.

However, any seconds-based usage might be kind of weird (we removed it before 
because it's simpler this way).


> On Sept. 18, 2015, 5:52 p.m., Artem Harutyunyan wrote:
> > docs/maintenance.md, line 134
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/37585/diff/11/?file=1076950#file1076950line134>
> >
> >     What does this mean? What if they aren't?

Added extra sentences.


> On Sept. 18, 2015, 5:52 p.m., Artem Harutyunyan wrote:
> > docs/maintenance.md, line 135
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/37585/diff/11/?file=1076950#file1076950line135>
> >
> >     Please explain a recommended workflow for updating maintenance 
> > schedule, and canceling it.

Added two sentences at the end of this section.


- Joseph


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37585/#review99635
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 18, 2015, 6:27 p.m., Joseph Wu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/37585/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 18, 2015, 6:27 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Ben Mahler, Artem Harutyunyan, 
> Joris Van Remoortere, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2083
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2083
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Heavily based on the design doc 
> (https://docs.google.com/document/d/16k0lVwpSGVOyxPSyXKmGC-gbNmRlisNEe4p-fAUSojk/).
> 
> Includes a diagram of the maintenance mode transitions.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/images/maintenance-primitives-modes.png PRE-CREATION 
>   docs/maintenance.md PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37585/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Copied to: https://gist.github.com/kaysoky/b9789c88ee204e3b49a2
> Checked for markdown correctness.
> 
> 
> File Attachments
> ----------------
> 
> Same as the image in the binary diff. (Uploaded for reviewer convenience.)
>   
> https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2015/09/01/7d3153ca-37f4-4948-acce-b140a3eb71a9__maintenance-primitives-modes.png
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joseph Wu
> 
>

Reply via email to