-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39429/#review103292
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!



3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/owned.hpp (lines 202 - 203)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39429/#comment161278>

    In libprocess we use `snake_case`.
    You can also consider removing the temporary. I'm fine either way as it 
serves as documentation. If you keep the temporary can you make it `const`? :-D



3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/shared.hpp (lines 171 - 172)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39429/#comment161279>

    `snake_case` for libprocess.


- Joris Van Remoortere


On Oct. 19, 2015, 4:48 a.m., Neil Conway wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39429/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 19, 2015, 4:48 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Joris Van Remoortere.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3326
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3326
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See MESOS-3326. We adopted std::atomic in most of the code base earlier 
> (commits
> 87de003c6e8a, 4b938052b6af, and 4a01850c5540), but a few places were omitted;
> those locations are fixed by this commit.
> 
> There's one last place to fix: we use the GCC intrinsic __sync_synchronize() 
> in
> 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/logging.h. Because that is used to protect
> modifications to the FLAGS_v variable defined by glog, we can't easily adapt 
> it
> to use std::atomic.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/owned.hpp 
> 17c42614155fed8fec185f29f9a9babb71ff5f85 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/shared.hpp 
> 021807b961bb55f11c9e04327135bd83f4d86c21 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/process_tests.cpp 
> a3c57a261c09f7b76b78225719e64a26f2d66cd3 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39429/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Neil Conway
> 
>

Reply via email to