-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39289/#review106653
-----------------------------------------------------------


Bad patch!

Reviews applied: [39211, 39018, 39102, 36913]

Failed command: ./support/apply-review.sh -n -r 36913

Error:
 2015-11-16 12:55:10 URL:https://reviews.apache.org/r/36913/diff/raw/ 
[7367/7367] -> "36913.patch" [1]
error: patch failed: src/Makefile.am:511
error: src/Makefile.am: patch does not apply
Failed to apply patch

- Mesos ReviewBot


On Nov. 16, 2015, 12:41 p.m., Jan Schlicht wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39289/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 16, 2015, 12:41 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Alexander Rojas, and Till 
> Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3862
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3862
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added authorization of quota requests.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/authorization.md f5ed75fcd0785fde38058917354fcf6d668dcccb 
>   include/mesos/authorizer/authorizer.hpp 
> d667a52f90f970a313580446a5a006cec4b5e25b 
>   include/mesos/authorizer/authorizer.proto 
> 86bbb45f9d91b4098a262e3e50a793f3bb39497e 
>   include/mesos/quota/quota.proto 4e4d8ccc92e2bf9a8e5eae8488c0c952f82fdd6d 
>   src/authorizer/local/authorizer.hpp 
> 32de102fd588f029882ef2222121ca83a7410c65 
>   src/authorizer/local/authorizer.cpp 
> 6d7da87731a438c2180cf91003e09d4aa5a1c773 
>   src/master/flags.cpp 806e2da6ad37a6acf76818d4c6b3c462175fd09d 
>   src/master/master.hpp ead8520b7108a0f2c3a0bb11ae7b543897d111a2 
>   src/master/quota_handler.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/tests/mesos.hpp 25074a0b8d86b83c5820f7a5a5e10b4ba9efb1ed 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39289/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jan Schlicht
> 
>

Reply via email to