-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39289/#review105847
-----------------------------------------------------------


Bad patch!

Reviews applied: [39211, 39018, 39102, 36913, 38059]

Failed command: ./support/apply-review.sh -n -r 38059

Error:
 2015-11-10 13:11:05 URL:https://reviews.apache.org/r/38059/diff/raw/ 
[7991/7991] -> "38059.patch" [1]
error: patch failed: src/master/master.hpp:860
error: src/master/master.hpp: patch does not apply
Failed to apply patch

- Mesos ReviewBot


On Nov. 10, 2015, 12:56 p.m., Jan Schlicht wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39289/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 10, 2015, 12:56 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Alexander Rojas, and Till 
> Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3862
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3862
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added authorization of quota requests.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/authorization.md 2a5e74782754e446184a297f91112e9f94077896 
>   include/mesos/authorizer/authorizer.hpp 
> d667a52f90f970a313580446a5a006cec4b5e25b 
>   include/mesos/authorizer/authorizer.proto 
> 86bbb45f9d91b4098a262e3e50a793f3bb39497e 
>   include/mesos/quota/quota.proto d2e3a45735e4ebcf257682556aff5075e6e3bf79 
>   src/authorizer/local/authorizer.hpp 
> 32de102fd588f029882ef2222121ca83a7410c65 
>   src/authorizer/local/authorizer.cpp 
> 6d7da87731a438c2180cf91003e09d4aa5a1c773 
>   src/master/flags.cpp 0285ce70cefca09e81ef7137968d024e297fec87 
>   src/master/master.hpp 3aa7017287506938d77bbfb1e06f510101009ee3 
>   src/master/quota_handler.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/tests/mesos.hpp 3e58b454c75a2ab9f8b4a29785fa823afefd0c8a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39289/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jan Schlicht
> 
>

Reply via email to