----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40340/#review107116 -----------------------------------------------------------
support/mesos-style.py (line 104) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/40340/#comment166064> unnecessary parentheses support/mesos-style.py (lines 105 - 106) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/40340/#comment166065> Mesos-style indenting doesn't apply (I think) here: ``` errors_found, captured_stderr = lint_and_capture_stderr( rules_filter, source_paths) ``` support/mesos-style.py (line 112) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/40340/#comment166066> not your code, but could you please remove the unnecessary `is not None` support/mesos-style.py (line 113) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/40340/#comment166067> what was wrong with: `print(line)` (and please be a good man, if it's not already there, can you please add -at the very top of this file-): ``` from __future__ import print_function ``` so this works with both 2.7 and 3.x? support/mesos-style.py (line 134) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/40340/#comment166069> +10 thanks! support/post-reviews.py (line 71) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/40340/#comment166070> missing "user" also note that epydoc support markdown; I would enumerate the various options as a bulleted list. ``` can respond with: - foo - bar - ... ``` support/post-reviews.py (lines 71 - 73) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/40340/#comment166071> is the user input case-insensitive? if not, worth mentioning support/post-reviews.py (lines 81 - 91) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/40340/#comment166072> +1 this is awesome - I wish all our methods were documented in this depth! support/post-reviews.py (line 106) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/40340/#comment166073> ``` while not choice in ['y', 'n', ctrl_d]: ``` - Marco Massenzio On Nov. 16, 2015, 9:25 a.m., Alex Clemmer wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/40340/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 16, 2015, 9:25 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Artem Harutyunyan, Michael Hopcroft, Joris Van > Remoortere, Joseph Wu, and Marco Massenzio. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Windows: Added Windows support to `support/post-reviews.py`. > > Early draft of the update to the Windows-compatible `post-reviews.py`. I'd > like to get early feedback from people in case this is entirely the wrong > direction. > > At the outset, I will say that the "right way" to do this would be to > refactor `cppylint.py` and `post-reviews.py` entirely so that they are more > modular (for example, make `post-reviews.py` function-oriented, instead of a > pile of statements and expressions, and `cpplint.py` should be a module > proper). I didn't do this the "right way" because it is blocking for our > Windows friends. If it's really important to do this the "right way", we may > need to break it into a couple reviews. > > Note that the most questionable part of this is the point at which we > redirect `stderr` in `cpplint.py` to a string capture it for use in > `post-reviews.py`. This is certainly the quickest way to do it, but it is not > the best -- the best way would be to refactor `cpplint.py` to be a module, at > least, and to handle error logging in a more pluggable way. We aimed for the > shortest diff because there are no tests for any of these scripts, and to be > honest, I was afraid of changing them without tests. > > > Diffs > ----- > > .gitignore-template 90b6697d19a5e0a68805b23b587b362731a1df25 > support/cpplint.py 6890e27f92603b025e25e4db01decf351c33c9a1 > support/mesos-style.py 66b45692c3c04f68358b63d52e4d87934f241bd7 > support/post-reviews.py 170be83aa6dca6e8175292169d78e8f7915f7e6e > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40340/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Alex Clemmer > >
