> On Jan. 13, 2016, 9:03 p.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> > src/slave/container_loggers/rotating.cpp, lines 148-151
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/41783/diff/5/?file=1196238#file1196238line148>
> >
> >     Why not do this in the constructor and then no need for the `if 
> > (process.get() != NULL) {` everywhere?

Do you mean to remove the not-initialized and double-initialize checks?

Note: The already committed Sandbox ContainerLogger also does this.  As well as 
the oversubscription modules.


- Joseph


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41783/#review114410
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 13, 2016, 6:12 p.m., Joseph Wu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/41783/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 13, 2016, 6:12 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Artem Harutyunyan.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4136
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4136
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Adds a non-default ContainerLogger that constrains total log size by rotating 
> logs (i.e. renaming the head log file).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/container_loggers/rotate.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/container_loggers/rotate.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/container_loggers/rotating.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/container_loggers/rotating.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41783/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joseph Wu
> 
>

Reply via email to