> On Feb. 28, 2016, 8:21 a.m., Adam B wrote:
> > Thanks! Couple of tweaks as I review it again.
> > - How did you test that this renders correctly? Did you try 
> > `support/site-docker` to see if the markdown translates properly to html? 
> > Just because it looks good in github doesn't mean our Rakefile will make it 
> > look as good.

Yes, I have tried `support/site-docker`. This new doc looks good.


> On Feb. 28, 2016, 8:21 a.m., Adam B wrote:
> > docs/weights.md, line 16
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/42719/diff/3/?file=1259048#file1259048line16>
> >
> >     Are we officially deprecating --weights in this release? If so, we'll 
> > need to update upgrades.md and the CHANGELOG to mention this.
> >     
> >     Could you also document what happens when a master restarts with a 
> > --weights flag that differs from what's in the registry? (We warn and use 
> > the registry value, correct?)

`--weights` does not deprecate in this release (0.28), for backwark 
compitibility, it will be deprecated in a future release (Maybe six months 
later).


- Yongqiao


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42719/#review121129
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 19, 2016, 7:56 a.m., Yongqiao Wang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/42719/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 19, 2016, 7:56 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Adam B.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3945
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3945
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add doc for weights.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/home.md 07214b927c112d7a180507ae03245892455fd757 
>   docs/weights.md PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42719/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Yongqiao Wang
> 
>

Reply via email to